Wednesday, October 7, 2026ArchiveSearchAsk the paper

The Computomatix Times

All the posts fit to save — curated from @computomatix's bookmarks & likes on X

Edition of Tuesday, July 7, 2026

4 stories

Uber Launches Agentic Pods to Bring AI Agents Beyond Engineering

Uber Launches Agentic Pods to Bring AI Agents Beyond Engineering

Praveen Neppalli reports that 99% of Uber engineers use AI tools and over 70% of pull requests involve agents. Uber paired about 30 engineers with business-function experts in two-week sprints, running 16 pods that cut tasks like capital allocation reporting from 15 hours to 30 minutes.

Original post · 3 min read
Agentic AI adoption is on fire at @Uber, and it's changing the way we build, not just in engineering, but across the entire company.

Today, 99% of our engineers use AI tools. More than 70% of pull requests are attributed to local or cloud agents. And our engineers have built 2,500+ agent skills across the software development lifecycle.
Those numbers are exciting, but they led us to a much bigger question:

How do we bring agentic AI beyond engineering?

Finance. Legal. Operations. Marketing. Customer Support. HR. Procurement.

These functions run on complex workflows that are often manual, highly nuanced, and spread across dozens of systems. You can't automate them effectively by looking at process diagrams or documentation. You have to understand how the work actually gets done.

So we created something called Agentic Pods.

The idea is simple.

We handpicked ~30 of our most AI-proficient engineers (people with deep knowledge of Uber's systems) and paired each of them with a domain expert from a business function.

Then we gave every pod just two weeks.
• Days 1 – 2: Shadow the expert. Observe every step. Document workflows. Ask questions. Build intuition.
• Day 3: Prioritize opportunities based on scale, repetition, business impact, and data availability.
• Days 4 – 5: Build a working agent alongside the person doing the job.
• Days 6 – 9: Validate with several others performing the same work. Does it generalize? Does it actually make their job better?
• Day 10: Ship.

In just the past two months, we've run 16 Agentic Pods across 16 different business functions.
• Capital allocation across 150 cities: 15 hours → 30 minutes.
• Financial pacing reports: 2 days → 10 minutes.
• Marketing web quality assurance: 2 weeks → 50 minutes.
• Support workflow creation: 9,000 manual workflows → self-service automation.

The productivity gains are impressive, but what surprised us most wasn't the speed.
• It was how quickly engineers embedded in unfamiliar domains uncovered opportunities that had been hiding in plain sight.
• The biggest wins rarely come from automating one task. They come from rethinking an entire workflow. Once you redesign the workflow around AI, you often eliminate handoffs, remove unnecessary approvals, replace legacy tooling, reduce vendor spend, and dramatically accelerate decision-making.
• The workflow becomes the unit of automation - not the individual task.
• The most impactful agent skills cut across teams, orgs, functions, tools, and systems.

The biggest lesson? The best AI opportunities are rarely visible from the outside.

You discover them by sitting next to the people doing the work, understanding every friction point, and building with them, not for them.

We're now forming a dedicated team to scale this further and go deeper. They'll deeply understand the work, redesign it from the ground up, and use AI to fundamentally change how the business operates.

It's exciting times!
♥ 3.0K · ⟲ 370 · 👁 1.7MView on X ↗

Arvind Jain Argues AI Projects Need Builders Close to Real Work

Arvind Jain Argues AI Projects Need Builders Close to Real Work

Arvind Jain endorses pairing technical builders with domain experts and grounding AI initiatives in a company's real workflows, arguing that projects stall when builders are removed from daily friction. He quotes Uber's Agentic Pods approach as the right model.

Original post · 1 min read
The approach here is exactly right. Pairing builders with domain experts, and grounding the work in the company’s real knowledge, systems, and workflow context.

Most AI initiatives don't stall for a lack of ambition or model capability, but because the people building the tools or workflows are too far removed from the friction of the actual work.

The breakthrough happens when you combine technical builders, domain experts, and the scattered knowledge, workarounds, context behind the workflow itself.

You can’t redesign the future if you’re too far removed from the friction of the present.
Praveen Neppalli @praveenTweets
Agentic AI adoption is on fire at @Uber, and it's changing the way we build, not just in engineering, but across the entire company.

Today, 99% of our engineers use AI tools. More than 70% of pull requests are attributed to local or cloud agents. And our engineers have built 2,500+ agent skills across the software development lifecycle.
Those numbers are exciting, but they led us to a much bigger question:

How do we bring agentic AI beyond engineering?

Finance. Legal. Operations. Marketing. Customer Support. HR. Procurement.

These functions run on complex workflows that are often manual, h…
♥ 637 · ⟲ 34 · 👁 208.4KView on X ↗

Alex Booker Praises Clear Explanations of AI Agent Loops

Alex Booker says he has read the clearest explanations of loops so far, quoting Aparna Dhinak's piece on the term's four meanings in AI engineering. The post is brief and mainly points to the linked explainer.

Original post · 1 min read
Clearest explanations of loops I've read so far
Aparna Dhinakaran @aparnadhinak
What the hell is a loop, anyway? — The AI engineering world adopted a new favorite word this month, and it means at least four different things: the loop.
We're currently at the peak of the hype cycle. On June 7, Peter Steinberger
♥ 3.3K · ⟲ 297 · 👁 1.1MView on X ↗

Options Trader Outlines Cash-Secured Put Strategy on Broadcom

Akshat Shrivastava describes selling a put option on Broadcom at a strike about 20% below its roughly 370 price to collect a premium of around 12% annualized. He argues the strategy suits investors willing to own the stock at a lower price.

Original post · 1 min read
I will make 12% rent without owning any stocks. Here is how:-

1) I own 0 stocks of AVGO (Broadcom). The stock trades at 370.
2) Fundamentally, this is one of the best businesses in the world to own.
3) Now, I will sell a PUT option at around 280. This is 20%+ Out of the Money.
4) For this, I will be paid roughly 6% yield over 6 months. So 12%+ in 1 year.
5) Now: some of you would say: that cash secured put is a risky strategy. What if the price hits 280$. And, you are forced to buy?
6) I am okay with this. AVGO falling to 280 means, it is down 40%+ from its peak. I am happy to buy 100 stocks here. Therefore, I picked a firm like AVGO to begin with.

If the stock does not fall to this point, cool, I will collect my 12% rent in $ terms.

Most people make losses on options because they don't make it part of their core portfolio. And, neither understand how to manage risks.

If you use it sensibly (especially in good markets like the US), you can make decent cash flows.
♥ 645 · ⟲ 31 · 👁 167.1KView on X ↗