Wednesday, October 7, 2026ArchiveSearchAsk the paper

The Computomatix Times

All the posts fit to save — curated from @computomatix's bookmarks & likes on X

Edition of Wednesday, April 29, 2026

3 stories

Cursor Releases SDK for Building Agents on Its Own Runtime

Cursor Releases SDK for Building Agents on Its Own Runtime▶

Cursor announces the Cursor SDK, which lets developers build agents using the same runtime, harness and models that power Cursor. Agents can run in CI/CD pipelines, power automations or be embedded in products, shown in a demo video.

Original post · 1 min read
We’re introducing the Cursor SDK so you can build agents with the same runtime, harness, and models that power Cursor.

Run agents from CI/CD pipelines, create automations for end-to-end workflows, or embed agents directly inside your products.
♥ 8.7K · ⟲ 803 · 👁 3.1MView on X ↗

Aakash Gupta Argues Adobe Is Trapped by Its Own Pricing Model

Aakash Gupta argues Adobe failed to ship an obvious cheap all-in-one design product because it would collapse the price anchor on its $60-per-month Creative Cloud seats, invoking Christensen's innovator's dilemma. He cites Anthropic's free Claude Design feature and its market impact, and links to a longer guide.

Original post · 2 min read
Adobe is the textbook case of why incumbents can't ship the obvious product.

Strike one: 2022. Adobe tries to buy Figma for $20B. EU and UK regulators block the deal in December 2023. Adobe pays a $1B termination fee and walks. Figma stays independent.

Strike two: 2023. Adobe ships Firefly to compete with Midjourney and DALL-E. Five billion dollars in AI investment and Firefly is still nowhere on the public model leaderboards. Express launches as the consumer flanker. 30 million users sign up. Revenue from those users is rounding error compared to Creative Cloud.

Strike three: 2026. Anthropic ships Claude Design as a free feature in a $20 chat subscription. $6 billion comes out of design SaaS market caps inside a week.

Adobe could have built Claude Design two years ago. Firefly is a competent image model. Sensei is a working ML platform. Express was already a simplified design tool. They had the pieces. They also had 25 million Creative Cloud subscribers paying $60 a month for what amounts to a multi-app bundle. Shipping a $20 all-in-one tool that produces a shareable URL would have collapsed the price anchor on every one of those seats overnight.

This is Christensen's Innovator's Dilemma in real time. The new entrant ships a worse product at a lower price for a customer the incumbent doesn't take seriously. The incumbent watches because the entrant looks like a toy. Then the entrant moves upmarket and the price anchor shatters. By the time the incumbent ships their own version, the seat is already on the new platform.

Adobe has the technology. Adobe has the customers. The trap is that $60 a month for one app is the most profitable product in software, and anything Adobe ships at $20 collapses the price anchor on the rest.

The market is pricing the trap.

Full breakdown: aibyaakash.com/p/claude-design
Aakash Gupta @aakashgupta
Claude Design will be the tool everyone is using 6 months from now. No wonder it erased $6B in market cap.

Here's how to get ahead: aibyaakash.com/p/claude-design

I have been using it every day for a week. The first two sessions produced outputs I would never have shown anyone. The third session produced a landing page I sent to three people who all assumed I had hired a designer.

The thing that changed was not the prompt.

Claude asks four clarifying questions before it builds anything. There is one specific answer in those four questions that moves output quality more than any…
♥ 97 · ⟲ 13 · 👁 35.6KView on X ↗

Mustufa Khan Summarizes Naval Ravikant's View That Pure Software Is Uninvestable

Naval Ravikant: Apple is dead, SaaS is next, you have 18 months

Mustufa Khan summarizes Naval Ravikant's podcast remarks that pure software is uninvestable and that Apple's software-driven premium is eroding as interfaces shift to AI agents. The article offers a structural argument for founders to reposition within 18 months.

Original post · 12 min read
X ArticleNaval Ravikant: Apple is dead, SaaS is next, you have 18 months
Apple is already dead. They just haven't filed the paperwork.
That's not a hot take. It's a structural read on what just happened in the last six months & what Naval Ravikant confirmed on his podcast last week. The most patient investor in tech & one of the sharpest capital allocators of the last 20 years just gave a verdict on the entire software industry: pure software is uninvestable.
If you're a founder reading this, the question isn't whether you believe it. The question is whether you have 18 months to reposition before the market notices.
For context: Naval founded AngelList, was an early investor in Twitter, Uber, Notion & roughly 200 other companies that shaped the last decade of tech. He doesn't post often. When he does, he picks his words like a man who knows they'll be quoted back at him for years. So when he says "pure software is uninvestable" with no qualifier, it's not commentary. It's a call.
Here's what he said & what it means for everyone building right now.
No one can stop Apple's structural death
Apple isn't going bankrupt. Apple won't disappear from your pocket next year. The collapse Naval is describing isn't operational. It's economic.
Apple's entire $3 trillion valuation rests on one thing: premium hardware margins justified by superior software experience. Take that experience away & Apple becomes Samsung with better build quality. That's exactly what's happening.
The interface layer is commoditizing in real time. Within 24 months, most people won't open apps the way they do today. They'll talk to an agent. The agent will generate whatever interface they need on the fly. Apple's curated app store, the human interface guidelines, the design polish, the ecosystem lock-in - all of it becomes irrelevant when the interface itself is generated in real time by an AI that runs on any phone.
Apple's response to this transition? They licensed Gemini from Google. Their own AI bet underdelivered. The company that built its entire identity on owning the experience layer just outsourced the experience layer to its biggest competitor.
This is the Microsoft-after-mobile playbook running in fast-forward.
Microsoft missed mobile because they refused to build a touch-native OS from the ground up. Their dominance in the previous era convinced them the old paradigm would hold. By the time they accepted the new one, Apple had already won the next decade. Microsoft is still worth $3T today, but Microsoft Windows lost the consumer war they could have won.
Apple is making the exact same mistake right now with AI. They're betting their hardware-first identity will carry them through the agent transition. It won't. When the OS commoditizes, Apple's margins compress to commodity hardware levels. That's a structural revenue collapse in their highest-margin segment, the one that funds everything else.
You can hold Apple stock through this. Just don't pretend you're holding a growth company.
The most valuable hardware company in history is about to find out what its hardware is worth without the software moat.
If your moat is software, you have 18 months
Now the harder part if you're a founder.
Naval said pure software is uninvestable. He's right. But he didn't unpack what that means for the tens of thousands of SaaS companies currently sitting on Series A & Series B valuations they raised in a different world.
It means most of them are already dead. They just don't know it yet.
Here's the math. Your SaaS company exists because building your product was hard. You raised capital because technical execution required a team. Your moat, whether you admit it out loud or not, is the difficulty of replicating what you built.
That difficulty just collapsed.
A 2-person team using Claude Code can now replicate 80% of most B2B SaaS products in under 90 days. Not a toy version. A working version. With proper architecture, basic security, room to scale. The remaining 20% - your specific integrations, your enterprise sales motion, your compliance stack - is real. But it's not a moat. It's friction. & friction gets compressed by the next generation of agents shipping every quarter.
Look at what's already happening. Adobe acquired Figma for $20B in 2022 because Figma's product was structurally hard to build. Today, design tools with 70% of Figma's core functionality are being shipped by solo developers in months. Salesforce is the most valuable SaaS company in history. AI-native CRMs that didn't exist 18 months ago are already eating its mid-market. Workday. ServiceNow. Atlassian. Asana. Every one of them is now a candidate for replacement by an AI-native alternative built by a team smaller than their HR department.
The companies that survive this transition won't be the ones with the best software. The software is going to zero. The companies that survive will be the ones that built something the AI cannot copy:
Distribution. Network effects. Data flywheels. Hardware integration. Brand. Community. Regulatory depth. These are … continue on X ↗
♥ 4.8K · ⟲ 646 · 👁 2.4MView on X ↗