Tobi Lütke Argues Code Should Be Judged on Merit, Not Origin
Tobi Lütke responds to a report that KDE's draft AI policy discourages disclosing LLM use, saying code should be accepted on merit with a human accountable for it. He says good code is good and slop is slop regardless of how it was made.
Original post · 1 min read
If it’s good, it’s good. If it’s slop, it’s slop.
The Lunduke Journal @LundukeJournalKDE is working on an official AI / LLM policy, and it reads like the rules of Fight Club.
In short, KDE’s AI policy:
1) Encourages using AI, as long as a human is kept “in the loop”.
2) But you can’t tell anyone that you used AI.
“Don’t disclose LLM usage”.
“Don’t add ‘Assisted-by: [some LLM]” (as is done in the Linux kernel).
“Nobody in KDE should know if you use an LLM”.
In other words: “Welcome to developing KDE with AI. The first rule of developing KDE with AI is: you do not talk about developing KDE with AI.”
invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/work_…