Steve Eisman Dismisses Burry's AI Depreciation Thesis as Academic
Fireside Alpha quotes Steve Eisman saying Michael Burry's argument about AI depreciation schedules is too academic and that an OpenAI failure would pose a far larger risk. The post quotes a Fireside Alpha clip that includes a separate Jensen Huang anecdote.
Original post · 1 min read
“I think, with all due respect to Michael, I think his argument is too academic."
"Put it this way: if AI succeeds because Anthropic and OpenAI grow like crazy and the hyperscalers do well, et cetera, et cetera, it’s not going to matter if the depreciation schedule changed from three to four years to five to six years."
"At the same time, if OpenAI fails and the whole chain goes in reverse, we’ll have a massive correction which has nothing to do with the depreciation schedule."
"I mean, I think what he’s deep down trying to point out is maybe there’s something wrong here, but I don’t think the thing that he’s pointing to as being wrong is important enough.”
Fireside Alpha @firesidealphaJensen Huang jokes ten Somaek drinks left him with no trouble kissing a Korean man on the mouth, and says he has a lot of fans, especially in Samsung's supply chain group
Jensen Huang: “And I’ll just tell you, I’ll just say this one inappropriate thing. I’ve only been kissed in the mouth by a man in Korea.”
Juju Chang: “Lori’s like, ‘Where is this going?’”
Jensen Huang: “I don’t know. And it was a Samsung employee, Jay.”
Juju Chang: “Wow, this is getting really good. Okay.”
Jensen Huang: “But we have some serious things I’ve got to say. But I just, what is that drink called where soju goe…

